Start with
Changed symbols
Map each changed file and symbol to graph nodes before asking what else may be affected.
A pull request's blast radius is the set of symbols, modules, routes, tests, and documentation that might be affected beyond the changed lines. A diff shows the proposed edit; a code graph shows where that edit can travel. Reviewers should use the graph to generate impact candidates, then verify every important path against source and tests.
Published Updated
Graphify stores inspectable artifacts so codebase knowledge can be reviewed by humans and reused by AI coding assistants.

Start with
Map each changed file and symbol to graph nodes before asking what else may be affected.
Trace
Find callers, consumers, route handlers, docs, and tests that depend on the changed interface.
Verify
Treat graph paths as review candidates, not proof that runtime behavior is correct.
A blast radius is the affected neighborhood around a change. It includes direct callers, transitive consumers, shared types, route boundaries, tests, operational configuration, and documentation that may need to change with the code.
The diff shows additions and deletions but not the dependency paths entering or leaving the changed code. Reviewers must reconstruct those paths manually unless a graph or code intelligence tool provides them.
A code graph stores files, symbols, imports, calls, and documentation links as nodes and edges. Starting from changed symbols, reviewers can traverse incoming and outgoing relationships to build an impact list.
Build or refresh the graph for the reviewed commit, map changed symbols to nodes, inspect reverse dependencies and architecture boundaries, then read every high-impact source file and run the related tests.
Use Graphify's affected command from the changed symbol, then inspect the resulting paths in graph.json or the interactive report. Adjust depth and relation filters to avoid returning an unusable list.
A graph may miss dynamic dispatch, runtime registrations, external services, feature-flag behavior, and deployment-specific configuration. The reviewer must use tests, traces, and source evidence to close those gaps.
graphify affected "AuthService.refreshToken" --depth 2 --relation callsNo. It improves navigation and highlights candidate impact; reviewers still evaluate design, behavior, security, and product intent.
No. A path is a candidate for review. Many dependencies will remain valid after a compatible change.
Refresh after structural changes, rebases, generated-code updates, or before reviewing a commit whose graph snapshot is stale.
List the changed symbol, affected path, source evidence, risk, and the test or manual check that covers it.
Continue through the Graphify topic cluster with pages that explain assistant context, architecture review, documentation, and graph-based codebase understanding.
Graphify vs CodeRabbit: code memory before review
Compare Graphify and CodeRabbit by workflow: persistent code knowledge graphs before coding versus AI pull request review after a change is ready.
Repository architecture review with Graphify
Use Graphify for repository architecture review by surfacing dependencies, subsystem clusters, graph centers, and unexpected cross-file links.
Code dependency visualization with Graphify
Turn a repository into a visual code dependency graph: how Graphify maps imports, calls, and clusters, and surfaces the high-impact modules worth reviewing.
Start from the use cases page or upload a project ZIP to build a graph that your team can inspect and reuse.